Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

Alternative Energy Spending Considered

It appears to me that people have some doubletalk on the green energy entrance. On one hand we have your EPA which looks like it's going after all the fossil fuel corporations within the energy sector, perhaps taking their nice time in approving fresh innovations and jobs for clean-coal coal-fired electrical energy era plants. Next, there's an unbelievable blockade regarding enforcement in our regulatory bodies preventing the inspectors and government bodies from doing everything to inhibit any alternative energy project which has been planned.

You'd think, with all of this wonderful interference as well as blocking by the govt for the alternative energy market, that they could absolutely run in for numerous touchdowns and win the bingo hands down. However that's not happening is it? Think about Solyndra, and all the other been unsuccessful clean energy jobs, which had been propped upwards and financed because of the taxpayer.

There was a fascinating article recently regarding President Obama's new budget that he sent to Congress in Federal government Executive Online posted on February 14, Next year titled; "Budget reflects scaled-back eye-sight for clean vitality," written by Coral formations Davenport of the National Diary. The article stated;

"Obama's monetary 2013 budget proposition asks Congress to raise spending on renewable-energy projects simply by about $500 million, exactly the same amount the DOE missing on its bank loan guarantee for the bankrupt solar-panel manufacturer Solyndra. DOE's increase usually takes renewables spending up to $2.Several billion - Next year it was $1.8 billion dollars. "In light of the restricted discretionary spending caps, this kind of increase in funding is critical and a testament to the importance of innovation and clean energy in the nation's economic future."

Okay so, My spouse and i run a Think Container and so, you are probably questioning what I think about all this. Well, let me begin by stating for the record that this is actually my "personal opinion" and not automatically that of the rest of the tankers pondering here. It is my truthful belief that the Usa government should pay for and support real research in all technological innovation sectors. That would consist of clean-coal technology, and better strategies to the efficiently gaining access to all of our natural sources that we need to keep our nation solid and economically match.

Inexpensive energy and also abundant energy will work for America. It's good regarding jobs, it helps each of our industries compete all over the world, and there's nothing wrong by using it. We've been led to believe that since the United States creates quite a bit of energy in-house, we are somehow detrimental to making it available to our citizens, merely due to the fact we produce far more energy than other places.

Energy is not evil and further, I would submit to you that lack of energy, and high expense of energy takes away from the actual pocketbook of the regular citizen, making their own lives tough. Never we care about People in the usa anymore, poor people who may have a tough time paying their own electric bills?

What we require is a level playing field, in which all types of energy may compete equally, along with where the best strength that produces the most BTU as an illustration at the lowest cost (every cost considered, including the decided upon environmental costs) could be the one we should utilize. If that happens to be clean-coal, geothermal power, Hydro, ocean wave, wind flow, nuclear, or solar, so be it. So we should be diversified sufficient not to put all each of our eggs in one gift basket either. Indeed Do you will please consider pretty much everything and think about it.

Don't be the product, buy the product!